English
What is the problem?
Many digital projects start from a blank page. The team interviews users, writes requirements, designs forms, defines roles, builds demo data, and only then discovers that 70 percent of the process looks like every other company in the same industry.
This wastes time before the business can even react to something concrete. It also makes demos expensive because each prospect or department expects a version that feels relevant.
What should the solution solve?
The solution should start with a useful template: common roles, common forms, common approval paths, and realistic sample data. AI should then help map the organization's wording and exceptions onto that baseline.
This gives teams a working first version quickly. They can point to what is correct, what is missing, and what must be changed because it is truly specific to their operation.
Trade-offs and alternatives
The benefit is speed and lower rollout cost. The trade-off is discipline: the team must resist customizing everything just because every department has its own language.
Alternatives include a fully bespoke build, buying a fixed vertical solution, or running workshops until every detail is documented. Those approaches may fit when the process is highly specialized. For common workflows like leave, expenses, assets, procurement, and compliance intake, templates usually get to value faster.
Conclusion
Use templates for what is common and AI for the gap between the template and reality. That is more economical than asking AI or developers to rebuild the obvious parts every time.